A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Malave, D. B.
- Resource Use Efficiency in Sugarcane Production in Konkan Region (M.S.)
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 566-570Abstract
The functional analysis was carried out to know the contribution of independent variables in yield of sugarcane. From the estimated Cobb-Douglas production function (log linear production function), it was observed that, in suru sugarcane co-efficient of determination (R2) was 0.9113 indicating 91 per cent of variation and in ratoon sugarcane co-efficient of determination (R2) was 0.9344 indicating that, 93 per cent of the variation in the yield explained by identified input variables included in the function. The expenditure on manures, plant protection, potassium and nitrogen in suru sugarcane cultivation and plant protection and manures to be curtailed considering their excess utilization in ratoon sugarcane cultivation. Whereas, MVP to FC ratios was more than unity for phosphorus and nitrogen, human labour, irrigation indicated under utilization of these resources in sugarcane cultivation which underlines scope of expanding the use of these inputs.Keywords
Resource Use Efficiency MVP, MFC Ratio, Allocative Efficiency.References
- Cobb, C.W. and Douglas, P.H. (1928). A theory of production. Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. American Econ. Rev., 18(1):139-165.
- Desai, M.R. (1986). Comparative economics of sugarcane cultivation with other competitive crops in the command area of Purna Cooperaive sugar factory Ltd., Basmatnagar. M.Sc.(Ag.) Thesis, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani, M.S. INDIA.
- Hanumanikar, R.H. Jadhav, S.N. and Ashalatha, K.V. (2009a). Knowledge level and socio-economic profile of sugarcane growers in Karnataka state. Agric. Update, 4 (1&2): 8-12.
- Hanumanaikar, R.H., Jadhav, S.N. and Ashalatha, K.V. (2009b). Correlation of socio-economic profile and adoption pattern of sugarcane practices by sugarcane growers of Karnataka state. Agric.Update, 4 (1&2): 51-55.
- Kaligouda, V.B. (1989). Economics of cropping pattern in Ghataprabha command area-A case study. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, University of Agriculture Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA).
- Malarkodi, M., Bharathi, K. and Janakirani, A.(2010). Sustaining sugarcane production in western zone of Tamil Nadu. Agric. Update, 5 (1&2): 99-102.
- Patel, P.L. and Supe, S.V. (2011). Adoption behaviour of sugarcane growers regarding integrated pest and disease management practices in Nandurbar district. Agric.Update, 6(3&4): 201-205.
- Patil, S.M. and Acharya, T.K.T. (1974). A comparative study of resource productivities and resource allocation on a sample of sugarcane and banana firms in Nasik and Jalgaon districts of Maharashtra. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 29(3).
- Prabhu, D. Arun, Vijayakumar, G. and Natarajan, U.S. (2006). Correlation co-efficient analysis in sugarcane evaluated for fodder yield. Internat. J. Agric. Sci., 2 (2): 472-473.
- Pudasaini, S.P. (1983). The contribution of education to allocative and technical efficiency in sugarcane production in Nepal. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 38(1): 48-55.
- Rai, D.P., Singh, Santosh Kumar and Pandey, Sachindra Kumar (2012). Socio-personal analysis and constraints encountered by the sugarcane growers of Burhanpur district (M.P.). Agric. Update, 7(3&4): 401-404.
- Cost, Returns and Profitability in Sugarcane Cultivation in Konkan Region (MS)
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), IN
Source
International Journal of Commerce & Business Management, Vol 8, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 17-22Abstract
In suru sugarcane group per hectare cost 'A' was Rs. 75,423, cost 'B' was Rs. 1,15,600 and cost 'C' was Rs. 1,43,664 while in ratoon sugarcane group per hectare cost 'A' was Rs. 48,228, cost 'B' was Rs. 71,693 and cost 'C' was Rs. 88,873, respectively. The net returns in suru sugarcane group were Rs. 1,63,286, Rs. 1,23,109 and Rs. 95,045 at cost 'A', 'B' and 'C', respectively while in ratoon sugarcane group net returns were Rs. 91,339, Rs. 67,874 and Rs. 50,694 at cost 'A', 'B' and 'C', respectively. The analysis of per hectare profitability of suru sugarcane and ratoon sugarcane crop indicated that cultivation of both type of sugarcane were profitable at all the levels of cost, as indicated by into benefit-cost ratio of suru sugarcane 1.66 and ratoon sugarcane 1.57. In suru sugarcane group per hectare main produce was 102.45 tonne and by produce was 20.49 tonne while in ratoon sugarcane group main produce was 59.90 tonne and by produce was 11.98 tonne.Keywords
Cost, Returns, Profitability, B:C Ratio.- Economics of Dietary Pattern of Farming Community in the South Konkan Region of Maharashtra
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Dist. Ratnagiri, IN
Source
The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol 33, No 10 (1996), Pagination: 250-254Abstract
Good health and sound manpower base are needed for agricultural growth. The availability of adequate and balanced diet hold key to all economic developments through its effect on growth and efficiency of human being. In India, one-fourth of the population is unable to get enough food to satisfy its calorie needs. The main problem of undernutrition and malnutrition is particulariy severe in third world countries including India. The main reason for this problem is of course inadequate income. The poor classes who contribute about two-fifth of the population are unable even to buy enough cereals, not to speak of protective foods.- Financial Feasibility of Investment in Broiler Poultry Units in Raigad District of Maharashtra
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), IN
2 Shriram College of Agriculture Business Management, Paniv, Solapur (M.S.), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 8, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 170-175Abstract
Per farm total cost of production was found highest on large poultry farm (Rs. 5232209) followed by the medium (Rs. 2636044) and small (Rs. 1395372) poultry farms. The cost of production per kg of live weight has inverse relation with the size of broiler farms. Per farm gross returns obtained from small, medium and large groups were Rs. 1590276, Rs. 3180338 and Rs. 6579208, respectively. However at the overall level it was Rs. 3327833. Out of which 98.08 per cent from sale of broiler, 1.67 per cent from sale of manure and 0.25 per cent from sale of empty gunny bags. The per farm and per bird cost benefit ratios at overall level was 1:1.22, whereas different size groups it was 1:1.14, 1:1.21 and 1:1.26 from small, medium and large groups, respectively. The financial feasibility analysis indicated positive net present value, benefit cost ratio has greater than one and internal rate of returns more than prevailing rate of interest in all size of broiler farms. This showed that the broiler poultry farming is profitable business in Raigad district.Keywords
Cost, Return, Financial Feasibility, NPV, BCR, PBP, IRR.References
- Barrier, Kalla G., Haruna,U., Abubakar, M., Hamidu, B.M. and Murtala, N. (2003). Economic analysis of broiler production at Miango Plateau State, Nigeria. Paper prepared for presentation at the Farm Management Association of Nigria Conference, Ayetoro, Nigeria.
- Bhandari, D.B. (2001). Economic analysis of poultry farming in Ratnagiri district. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri,M.S. (INDIA).
- Dake, S.D. (1994). Poultry industry in Ratnagiri district in Konkan region of Maharashtra state. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri,M.S.(INDIA).
- Hamra, C. F. (2010). An assessment of the Potential Profitability of Poultry Farms: A Broiler Farm Feasibility Case Study. A Research Paper, the Faculty of the University of Tennessee at Martin.
- Jadhav, D.V. (2011). Financial feasibility of investment in Emu farming in south Konkan region. Thesis, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri,M.S. (INDIA).
- Joshi, V. G. (1989). Economics of poultry production in Ratnagiri district (M.S.). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri,M.S. (INDIA).
- Mahadik, S. D. (1997). Economics of poultry farming in Raigad district. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri,M.S. (INDIA).
- Returns Analysis of Technology of Paclobutrazol Application in Rainfed Alphonso Mango Production in Maharashtra
Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Dr. B.S. Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.), IN
Source
The Asian Journal of Horticulture, Vol 10, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 167-172Abstract
The Paclobutrozol (PBZ) application has induced early flowering in rainfed mango orchard due to enhanced use of critical inputs as a per canopy of mango tree. The application of manures and fertilizers viz., N.P.K. when compared with recommended levels. The analysis revealed that the input gap for manures was to the extent of 78.5 per cent in PBZ non-adopter group and 74.7 per cent in PBZ adopter group. In case of chemical fertilizer viz., N.P.K. was to the extent of 58.67 per cent, 34 per cent and 59 per cent in PBZ non-adopter group and 9.33 per cent, 14 per cent and 46 per cent in PBZ adopters group, respectively. On account of this, the per hectare productivity of rainfed mango orchard was 6.2 t/ha in PBZ adopter category and 3.9 t/ha in PBZ non-adopter category. The per hectare cost of cultivation was Rs. 122373/- and Rs. 69561/- with per tone cost of cultivation of mango was to the tune of Rs. 26037/- and Rs. 23822/ - in PBZ adopter and PBZ non-adopter category, respectively. The per hectare gross returns were Rs. 251450/- and Rs. 119720/- with benefit cost ratio of 2.05 and 1.72 in PBZ in the same order. The benefits due to PBZ, application were valued to Rs. 95230/ha with a additional cost of Rs. 27730/ha realizing net incremental benefits to the tune of Rs. 67460/ha. Better productivity and price advantage grabbed in the early start of marketing season, were the benefits to the PBZ adopter category which resulted into higher per hectare income. As a whole, the net returns were 157.33 per cent higher for PBZ adopters than to PBZ non-adopters.